
Surface lamination
Roller and sheet path visible. Current operation and ownership unverified.
Website candidate · To verifyManufacturing capabilities
Review the folding work, surface processes and handover checks. Confirm who performs each operation for your chosen box.
Discuss Manufacturing Requirements
Historical company website candidates only. Current process, location, ownership and permission remain to verify. Current assembly and inspection evidence is still needed.
Website photographs are candidates. The route and operator for your folding box remain to be confirmed.

Roller and sheet path visible. Current operation and ownership unverified.
Website candidate · To verifyFeed and roller area visible. Process operator and current use unverified.
Website candidate · To verify
Company album equipment image. Present use and box format unverified.
Website candidate · To verifyBefore approving a production route, identify the operator, the inspection owner and the handover reference for each process.
Confirm the site and the operations performed by Jinma for the selected structure.
Current scope: to verifyName the provider and agree how material, artwork and work are handed over.
Provider and scope: to verifyAgree who checks each stage, who releases it and who handles an issue.
Owner and method: to verify| Process scope | Operator to confirm | Handover input to agree |
|---|---|---|
| Print & surface work | Jinma or named partner — unverified | Artwork version, material reference and agreed appearance |
| Folding & assembly | Jinma or named partner — unverified | Selected structure, corner fixing and assembled reference |
| Inspection & packing | Named inspection and packing owners — unverified | Check scope, acceptance reference and packing arrangement |
This is a proposed responsibility framework. It is not a confirmed subcontractor list or evidence that all work is performed on one site.
Proposed project review sequence
A general quality statement cannot replace the reference and checks for the chosen folding box.
Discuss Inspection RequirementsCompare the print, colour and visible surface against the agreed reference.
Reference and owner to agreeDefine the panel, corner-fixing and formed-state checks.
Reference and owner to agreeDefine the lid alignment, closure and insert/item-fit checks.
Reference and owner to agreeConfirm the delivery state, version labels and agreed packing arrangement.
Reference and owner to agreeProposed project checkpoints only. Test methods, acceptance criteria, sampling rules and the responsible party require confirmation. No certification or test result is claimed.

Confirm whether the box travels flat or assembled, how inserts are packed and who performs the final fitting.
Carton size, quantity, weight and destination are order-specific. A flat body alone does not establish a shipping saving.
Review packing inputsThe agreed inputs should follow the work, especially when artwork versions or suppliers change.
Approved construction and dimensions, including the measurement basis.
Current file, version and approval responsibility.
The selected reference and what it represents.
Delivery state, insert fitting and order labels.
These are the records to agree for a project, not existing Jinma order documents or an approved sample history.
The current in-house and partner scope has not been verified. Confirm the operator and inspection responsibility for the operations relevant to your selected box.
Ask for current photographs of the relevant operations, the named process owner and the agreed sample or specification. Generic workshop imagery does not establish the route for your order.
Those conditions require a project-specific response based on the structure, artwork versions, quantity, sampling and production responsibilities. This proposal states no fixed MOQ or lead time.
Bring the structure, quantity, appearance and delivery requirements. Identify the process and quality owners before approval.