Approved sample
Identify the sample and the approval decision relevant to this order.
Quality Assurance
Start with the order reference and the requirements you need to verify before production and shipment.
Discuss Inspection RequirementsPhotographs linked to the chosen sample, review method and responsible party are needed. No person or inspection scene is simulated.
Collapsible rigid gift boxes, including optional magnetic closure. Inspection scope, methods, sampling and responsibility require confirmation for the order.
Discuss what the checks will refer to, who approves the reference and which changes need another review.

Identify the sample and the approval decision relevant to this order.
Identify the material list, artwork and agreed specification version.
Agree the review points, sampling approach and evidence required.
Define the applicable review categories: dimensions, colour, folds, bonding and closure where relevant.

Compare the selected construction with the agreed reference. The photograph cannot establish board grade, paper, coating or dimensional accuracy.
Discuss the detail, the reference and the acceptance requirement. Do not treat a photograph alone as a pass or fail decision.
Identify the structure, material, product and conditions involved before discussing a test or report.
Discuss the available checks, the order reference, the method and who records the result.
Discuss whether an external test is needed and confirm its method, scope and reporting arrangements.
Methods, external testing arrangements and reports are to confirm. No test service, certificate or result is offered here.
Review the folding body, closure and product fit as related choices. A magnetic interface is an optional configuration within the folding-box family.
Agree how formed and flat states, corner fixing and assembly will be reviewed on the same selected model. No fold-cycle result or fixing specification is established.
Review folding-box references
Discuss lid alignment, the intended closing action and the agreed check method.
Review the optional closure
Agree the product dimensions, removal needs and insert-fitting responsibility. A fitting check is different from a verified protection test.
Discuss product and insert inputsClarify the review point and the responsible person. Agree which records are needed for the order.
Proposed discussion points, not a confirmed Jinma inspection sequence. Method, frequency, operator and record are to agree.
Which material details need to match the order reference?
Reference: material identity and requirements to agreeWhat should be checked before continuing the production run?
Reference: intended construction and sample scopeWhich construction and appearance points need attention during production?
Record: observation and responsible reviewer to agreeWhich checks and packing records are required before shipment?
Record: box and packing requirements to agreeDiscuss how an observation will be reviewed, communicated and resolved for the order.
No actual defect, measured value, pass/fail result or existing Jinma report is represented.
Agree how affected items are identified and how their status is handled during review.
Share the reference, observations and evidence with the agreed decision-makers.
Discuss the next step and the records needed to close or recheck the issue.
Discussion relationship only. Actual issue handling and records require confirmation.
Start with the selected collapsible body, closure, materials and intended product fit. Agree the reference, measurement basis, method, sampling and owner. These concepts do not establish a testing standard.
Identify the observed point, affected item, relevant reference and supporting evidence. Agree the reviewer, decision and next action. A photograph alone is not an acceptance decision.
Share the product, structure, acceptance requirements and any evidence your team needs to review.